Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:CORSAR

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:23, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Draft:CORSAR


Five submissions in two days is getting to the point of TENDITIOUS editing. Doesn't look like there will be any further improvement, and it doesn't appear that the subject is notable at this time. Primefac (talk) 18:46, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The editing does appear to be getting to the point of TENDITIOUS editing --TheSandDoctor (talk) 21:18, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The creator has also removed the MfD tags (restored) but I can't find anything source wise to support the creation of an article at this time. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  14:38, 30 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment Thank you for restoring those. I wonder why they did that......They should be warned but not sure which twinkle template would be appropriate, would it be 'removing  templates'? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 16:27, 30 March 2017 (UTC)


 * EDIT: I added the draft to my watch list and will look out for further inappropriate content removal like the above. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 16:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Normally for a draft that's only a week old, I'd say keep to allow the opportunity for improvement if possible — but this many immediate resubmissions in such a short time, without properly addressing the reasons why it's getting rejected, is tendentious enough to require an immediate remedy. Bearcat (talk) 16:49, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.