Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Cafe Hostess

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: redirect to Cafe Hostess. redirects are cheap &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 03:55, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Cafe Hostess


Article Cafe Hostess now exists that is slightly more detailed than this draft, so that this draft no longer is necessary.

Author of this draft has been blocked for disruptively creating sub-stubs such as this one. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:41, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete not worth a redirect Legacypac (talk) 07:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete not worth a redirect . Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:40, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Ummm. Redirects are much cheaper than MfD discussion pages with associated administration. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 16:32, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - User:SmokeyJoe is right. Why not redirect from the draft to the article?  That is normally what happens when the draft "grows up" into an article.  Robert McClenon (talk) 23:58, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Cafe Hostess. North America1000 05:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I would have simply redirected this instead of making a MfD nomination, but now that we are in the heavyweight process and its administration is a sunk cost, we can opt to suppress the creation of a useless redirect.jni (delete)...just not interested 18:06, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete since we're here. VQuakr (talk) 17:43, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect. Give the editor, who appears to have poor English, credit for first having the idea of giving the encyclopedia an article on a notable film. (In fact a history merge would be fair.) The efforts of those who wrote it up properly are not diminished by recognizing that the original creator identified it as notable and gave the essential information. Yngvadottir (talk) 20:23, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.