Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Camille Labchuk

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete. G5 per Serial's recommendation. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Camille Labchuk

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Nobody has edited this since a sockpuppet with NPOV concerns made this poorly cited article. Cryssalis (talk) 19:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Good work, . I understand why deprodded it, but you'll be glad to hear that, to save you and the rest of us time and trouble, we have speedy deletion, and criterion G5 is relevant: pages created by users users in violation of their ban or block, and that have no substantial edits by others can be deleted without further discussion. This article was created on 18 July last year, bu which time the sock master had been blocked nearly a month, and it has had no substantive editing by others (indeed, the only non-procedural edit to have been made changed 2 characters). So G5-ahead.  ——  Serial  19:18, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.