Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:CarryMinati

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 17:49, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:CarryMinati


This draft has been declined five times (and Draft:Carryminati has been declined once) for lack of notability and independent sources. In December, Articles for deletion/Carry Minati was closed as delete for the same reason; Carry Minati has been recreated several times and deleted, and CarryMinati was salted after multiple recreations (most recently yesterday).

I'm suggesting that this draft be deleted because 1) there is no indication that it could become a Wikipedia article - in fact, the fifth rejection stated that it should not be resubmitted; and 2) because a group of different SPAs and IPs have been recreating the article to the point of disruption, and keeping this draft would be a way to allow the use of Wikipedia as a host for unencyclopedic material. Draft:Carryminati should be deleted for the same reason. bonadea contributions talk 10:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence at all of notability and the constant resubmitting is getting disruptive. Theroadislong (talk) 11:20, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:GNG. HandsomeFella (talk) 00:30, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * FYI, failing GNG is emphatically not sufficient reason to delete in draftspace. A2soup (talk) 05:57, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * FTR, Draft:CarryMinati was resubmitted a sixth time and declined, and now they have moved to Draft:Carryminati instead, evidently to try to disguise the many rejections of the same draft. Disruptive is about right. --bonadea contributions talk 06:59, 23 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, no indication that this subject is anywhere close to notability, plus rather disruptive editing. I just scrubbed both drafts of copyright violations; the various declines and reviewers' comments should still be in place. Huon (talk) 14:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.