Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Casa De San Miguel Montessori School

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Woulda been deleted with the mainspace version if it'd been retargeted already. Since most comments support retargeting, I'll go one step further and delete on the basis of the AfD result. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:19, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Casa De San Miguel Montessori School


See also

This is a copy of an already existing article, Casa De San Miguel Montessori School. Dan arndt (talk) 02:14, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy retarget to the mainspace version which has been nominated for deletion. No reason to have two discussions. Legacypac (talk) 02:20, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Redirect (don’t mfd when there is coverage in mainspace, redirect instead). Delete (CSD#G8) if Articles for deletion/Casa De San Miguel Montessori School ends as “delete”. SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - There is also an identical draft in a sandbox, which also should be either redirected or G8d depending on the outcome of the AFD. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:44, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Question for User:Legacypac and anyone else. Speedy retarget appears to mean bundling these MFD discussions with the AFD.  Can MFD discussions be bundled with AFD?  If so, rebundle.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:11, 18 April 2018 (UTC)


 * since the page exists in mainspace we can just redirect it (a better term than retarget) If the mainspace version gets deleted this one gets deleted as a dependant page. There is no point having two or three discussions and AfD is a more senior discussion board. I suppose we could have draftified the mainspace version and bundled it here but draftifying something to immediately MfD it is pointless. Legacypac (talk) 16:55, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Yes. I don't think that draftifying a mainspace version and then MFD'ing it is a good idea.  Draftifying is an alternative to article deletion.  Besides, the article couldn't be draftified to its usual title because there was already a draft.  If an author is bound and determined to force a page into article space, then just apply article space criteria.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:33, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.