Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Catapult Chicago

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. , please be sure to include the header next time or else it'll vanish from the MFD pagelist. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Catapult Chicago


Repeated re-submission at AfC even though multiple reviewers have advised that does not meet wp:corp or any other category of notability. LaMona (talk) 04:29, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * This needs to be deleted as it is not notable. I just found it re-submitted at AfC AGAIN, for the sixth time in a year. DELETE, please. --FeralOink (talk) 22:48, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as this is best restarted when better solid in-depth third-party sources overall. BTW I added this to the MfD log as it had not yet been added. Simply FYI also, this is supposed to have had the nomination formatting (see Template:Mfd).  SwisterTwister   talk  22:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.