Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Catherine Burks-Brooks

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. (NAC) Armbrust The Homunculus 13:01, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Catherine Burks-Brooks


Notability (lack of). JustBerry (talk) 06:58, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Pro-forma., This article is being actively improved. WP:G13 is the CSD that revolves around AFC stale submissions.  Please review the purpose of WP:DRAFT and WP:AFC. I don't see any of the other CSD rationale, so it makes sense to give this article space. Nor is Notability a appropriate reason for deleting in draft namespace. Hasteur (talk) 23:42, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's unfair to nominate a draft or even an article for deletion without first fixing coding errors so that all of the text and references are visible. Experienced editors should help the new editors first, and only nominate for deletion when all else fails.  &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 00:59, 30 May 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.