Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Catz 'n Dogz

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. RL0919 (talk) 20:32, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Catz 'n Dogz


Page has been declined 6 times across 3 years. Submitted again with the submitter claiming a rewrite. Time to put the page out of it's misery. Legacypac (talk) 07:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Substantially edited since the previous submission 7 months ago. Give the author real feedback. I personally think that he should be told to improve existing content before being allowed to create new pages on new topics.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Question - Is there a conflict of interest by the reclaiming editor? Robert McClenon (talk) 03:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - On the one hand, it wasn't worth bringing back from the article graveyard. On the other hand, it didn't really need nominating for deletion at this point, but here we are:
 * Weak Delete Robert McClenon (talk) 03:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete This zombie draft needs to die. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 08:42, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.