Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Cayley-Menger relations

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 15:07, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Cayley-Menger relations

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

This was created for a University of Florida class in 2020. It has a lot of broken formulas, and might be too technical for a general-interest encyclopedia? -- Beland (talk) 20:29, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's a draft. It has a lot of broken formulas, and may be too technical.  It should be tagged as having broken formulas, although that may not be necessary because the error messages jump out at the reader.  If it is submitted in its current shape, it should be declined.  It can be improved while in draft space.  If it isn't edited in six months, it will be deleted as G13.  If it is improved, then it can be kept in draft space for further improvement.  Maybe the nominator is not familiar with how draft space is used.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:32, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - There are hidden comments in this draft. I have copied the comments to the draft talk page and unhidden them for the possible benefit of future editors.  (It is too technical for me to understand.  This is not higher math that I have forgotten in the past fifty years, because it is not higher math for chemists.)  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:41, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge with Cayley–Menger determinant. It shouldn’t be too hard to fix the broken formulae. On the other hand, I have noticed there is the article "Cayley–Menger determinant" in mainspace, which looks very closely related. Maybe we don’t need a separate article and in that case, the merger is in order. (I don’t know enough graph theory to know if a separate article is needed.) By the way, if this draft is too technical, then the mainspace article is too technical too. —- Taku (talk) 06:11, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.