Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ceneezer

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedily deleted per G3 by Ad Orientem. (non-admin closure) —  Godsy (TALK CONT ) 11:22, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Ceneezer


Appears to be a complete joke, and sources seem to be random pages. Home Lander (talk) 03:04, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

MEanwhile if you bothered to check, they are all valid and about the subject Also, this is not the first time you've censored me, I wrote an adition to your article on asgadia that got removed even though it's true and I have proof! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceneezer (talk • contribs) 03:17, 24 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete / query: To any admin who is well versed in these things, would this gibberish qualify under WP:G1? Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 03:29, 24 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm not an Admin but thousands of CSDs filed tells me this is not G1 because it has words but I'm tagging it as a G3 Hoax because it is totally not true. Legacypac (talk) 03:32, 24 October 2018 (UTC) Draft:Omniverse Theory is equally crap. Legacypac (talk) 03:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Please close: This and their other draft deleted, and user indefed after ANi report Legacypac (talk) 06:32, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.