Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Centenary of Military Aviation 2014 Air Show

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Centenary of Military Aviation 2014 Air Show


Abandoned draft article incubated from main space following a AfD in 2014. MilborneOne (talk) 09:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * So what is it that you want? Someone else to return it to mainspace?  Someone else to look for sources?  Someone else to request restoration of the deleted talk page?  Unscintillating (talk) 12:40, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Correction, the Draft talk: page is there. There is relevant info there.  Unscintillating (talk) 12:47, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Bit confused by your comments "what is it that you want" I presumed this page was for requesting deletion, if it is not how do I delete it? MilborneOne (talk) 17:12, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm probably the last person to ask how to use this page.
 * The last we left this at AfD, the event had not yet occurred. The people who indicated interest never edited the draft.  Why do you want it deleted?  Unscintillating (talk) 19:05, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Because it is not particularly notable and normally draft articles are deleted after six months if they have been abandoned and that is the case here but we do not have speedy deletion criteria that covers drafts that have been moved from mainspace. MilborneOne (talk) 19:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * It appears to me that you don't know if this material should be moved to mainspace, kept as a draft, or deleted. I don't dispute your point that it is "not particularly notable".  Unscintillating (talk) 22:35, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * This page is titled "Miscellany for deletion" which is why I am confused by your comments as this is as the title suggests a nomination for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 16:48, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but I am trying to be clear. Perhaps you would consider looking at the sources in the existing draft and the sources on the talk page, and if there is a problem with the sourcing, express an opinion about what else is needed.  That way, I would know what you perceived to be the need, and I could investigate the issue further.  Have you tried contacting the article creator and the editors in the AfD?  Unscintillating (talk) 20:11, 5 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:EVENT, WP:GNG. I think CSD G13 applies, despite this AfD-mandated incubation (that never really happened in first place). jni (delete)...just not interested 18:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Utterly stale in the nearly two years since AfD sent to draft space, as an alternative to immediate deletion. It seems as though the article was just created for promotional purposes, and even that no longer applies, as the event is long since over. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 23:13, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete for now at best as there have been no further changes. SwisterTwister   talk  20:46, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.