Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Chaos Fatigue

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:43, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Chaos Fatigue


Mostly an advertising link for a book. Not a straightforward G11 because it is partly about a book and partly about a concept, but being about two topics is part of its problem. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:33, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a notable concept or book. jni (delete)...just not interested 19:32, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I argue that that pages like like, blatant promotion mixed with something not quite blatant promotion, can and should be deleted under G11 if the only sources are non-independent, as a draft based on non-independent sources even if notable should be WP:TNT-ed anyway.  Not sure if everyone buys that argument?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:47, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.