Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Charity Bank

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. ‑Scottywong | [talk] || 23:58, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Charity Bank

 * – (View MfD)

Repeated efforts for several years to make an article. No likelihood of there ever being a satisfactory one as there is no notability.  DGG ( talk ) 08:42, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Neutral at this time. No evidence of tendentious editing, disruptive resubmission, undisclosed paid editing, or other conduct issue.  Robert McClenon (talk) 13:43, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Too close to notable. Consider merging to an existing article, eg Social enterprise lending. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:12, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete this draft was poorly made from the beginning.Catfurball (talk) 18:15, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Lack of notability is not a deletion reason for a draft, it is there in part to see if notability can be established. Neither is poor writing. Thsi does not harm, and the topic seesm one that might be able to constitute a valid articel -- the institution celarly does exist, and has soem RS coverage. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:34, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep since it's just a draft and not obvious crap. Main author hasn't worked on it since January, so it may end up as G13 anyway. -Crossroads- (talk) 05:24, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.