Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Charles Babbage

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Charles Babbage


Draft article is redundant to Charles Babbage, and is in fact a text dump of the article. Whpq (talk) 16:14, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * delete It's not implicitly impossible that such a draft would have value, but nothing about the history of this one is encouraging. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * delete we are discussing a speedy criteria for this - it violates WP:UP and though recent, does not look like any effort is being made to modify or edit this plain text dump. Legacypac (talk) 16:39, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.