Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Chongqing noodles

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Keep' with the promotionalism removed, nac. SwisterTwister  talk  20:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Chongqing noodles


Overindulgent self-profiling that has such blatancy as cooking how-to, ingredients and nutrition. SwisterTwister  talk  18:25, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep – I added the inuse template to the article (diff) and was working on it, then it was nominated for deletion. The In use template states, "This template page is actively undergoing a major edit for a short while. To help avoid edit conflicts, please do not edit this page while this message is displayed." Why not allow time for editors improve the draft, which I am presently working on? North America1000 18:29, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep If a respected editor such as North America is currently working on it and he has the proper inuse tag, I see no reason for this to even be considered for deletion. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment – I have significantly pared down the draft. Compare the present version of draft compared to how it appeared when it was nominated for deletion (link). The nomination for deletion is no longer relevant relative to the changes I have made to the draft. North America1000 18:40, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.