Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Chris Chappelear (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Chris Chappelear

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

There is a lack of sources to establish notability under politicians notability guidelines. Platoonwinterberry (talk) 16:54, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per consensus established at the last MFD. We do not delete drafts for lack of sources to establish notability.  We delete drafts when they have sat untouched for 6 months. This one hasn't. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 17:42, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Disruptive non-policy based nomination.Slywriter (talk) 18:57, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Just as there was in September 2021, there is tendentious speedy deletion tagging. The previous MFD was only stupid and not tendentious, but the speedy taggings were tendentious.  This MFD is tendentious.  There apparently are users who really really want to delete this draft.  The nominator should be warned.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:23, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.