Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Christiane Woopen

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  keep. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Christiane Woopen


Copyright violation of ethikrat.org/about-us/members/christiane-woopen. Mr. Guye (talk) 03:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * yes, but only copies lists of facts. Let's give the user a chance to turn it into an article. LaMona (talk) 23:38, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep or at least restart for a better article as this may be an acceptable article. Notifying for familiar analysis.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:04, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. I rewrote the list of positions, etc. --the way it was expressed could indeed be considered copyvio,  and it's better to rewrite even lists of facts if possible, to avoid people thinking that. (my experience is that it's easier to rewrite things like this than to explain to someone else how to do it)    Citations are probably sufficient when her field is viewed as ethics, not biology. I will have no hesitation in moving this to mainspace.   DGG ( talk ) 06:23, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * No copyright violation in the history. The list information is not creative content and not copyright-able.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:21, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.