Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Coding

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Based on what is in the draft a redirect to coding would be the wrong target CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 13:28, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Coding

 * – (View MfD)

Article was created by a problem editor. It is unsourced and duplicates existing content. Never likely to become an article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:16, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy Redirect to Coding. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The Coding disambiguation never spent time as a draft, so leaving it as a redirect would be misleading. The content at this point is a dictionary definition so it could be regarded as a test article. If it was created from sock evasion or spam then it can be deleted as such. AngusW🐶🐶F  ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.