Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Constitutional Republic of Eintrachtia

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 23:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Constitutional Republic of Eintrachtia

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Rejected twice original author continues to delete rejections and resubmit. This is now tedious and not worth keeping. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)


 * This is an important milestone for the micronation and it is considered very notable and is worth to be mentioned in Wikipedia. People might think this consideration is subjective, but for the people and the sake of the micronation it is a minor contribution to the Wikipedia and the Micronation community. C.R.Eintrachtia (talk) 14:46, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * you are absolutely not allowed to create promotional articles for things MADEUP one day. Dronebogus (talk) 14:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Your Royal Highness Dronebogus (talk) 14:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you C.R.Eintrachtia (talk) 14:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Once again, it is not a promotional article but an article purposed to be viewed as a source of information. C.R.Eintrachtia (talk) 14:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Please understand. C.R.Eintrachtia (talk) 14:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Your country is not notable because nobody is discussing it in reliable (or likely any) sources. Dronebogus (talk) 15:00, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Also “crowned republic” is a metaphor not a real system of government. Dronebogus (talk) 15:02, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * If you’d like to goof around and create pages about your non-notable fantasy state then keep it in userspace. Dronebogus (talk) 15:03, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Understandable C.R.Eintrachtia (talk) 15:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Nevermind you may delete the page if it violates any policies of Wikipedia C.R.Eintrachtia (talk) 15:07, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry for disturbing your day C.R.Eintrachtia (talk) 15:07, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * That's terrible advice - userspace is also not for webhosting. Unless they actually start contributing to the project in user space this would be speedy deletable under criterion wp:U5
 * Wikipedia is a site for writing an encyclopaedia, it isn't a place to host your own personal webpages on things you've just made up. I think fandom has a site dedicated to creating micronations, you might want to try there instead. https://micronations.fandom.com/wiki/Main_Page 192.76.8.70 (talk) 02:00, 7 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete Unclear why this isn't a speedy delete. He's welcome to make a blog for this, doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 17:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Creator is fine with deletion. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:56, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nominator. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:10, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete this time around per nominator, but if this page ever gets re-created, salt it. --NotReallySoroka (talk) 02:15, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. ShiriEditsTalk 02:27, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. WP:MADEUP, better suited for Fandom.  Vanilla  Wizard  💙 02:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.