Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Consumer Advocates for RCFE Reform

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Consumer Advocates for RCFE Reform


Author and only contributor to this draft has been blocked indefinitely by User:Diannaa for using Wikipedia only for promotional purposes. Since this draft will probably be abandoned in six months, delete it now. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * There's also the nearly-identical User:Rcfereformer/Consumer Advocates for RCFE Reform. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - Some editors create multiple copies of drafts. It annoys the reviewers and complicates the process of moving them into draft space.  It would also complicate the process of moving them into article space, except that the editors who create multiple copies typically never get them into shape for article space.  Robert McClenon (talk) 19:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I think we can take the short route with this one instead of waiting six months. Abandoned near-duplicate of another draft => low value for the project. jni (delete)...just not interested 18:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.