Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Corruption in the government of Azerbaijan

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G13 (it is not G5 eligible). Any user is free to request a undeletion at any time, if they wish. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Corruption in the government of Azerbaijan


Created by blocked editor, doubt it will ever go live. Doug Weller talk 19:11, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete at best and restart if better available later. SwisterTwister   talk  23:43, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Insufficient rational offered for deletion.  Either delete via G5 if applicable, or via G13 according to standard process.  Does not look like something that should come to MfD.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:54, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. From the creator of Draftspace, If they're being deleted at MFD for only because stale, those MFDs are wrong. - 166.170.49.77 (talk) 09:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: (1) the IP editor appears to be an indefinitely blocked editor, evading a block. (2) The idea that it is somehow "wrong" for consensus at MfD to delete a draft because it is "stale" is just the opinion of one editor, unsupported by any policy or guideline, or, so far as I know, by general consensus. (Indeed, the existence of speedy deletion criterion G13 shows that there is consensus that drafts can be deleted because they are stale, and the notion that somehow that is appropriate for speedy deletion but not for MfD is an odd one.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 11:57, 21 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep User:Democratic Peace Initiative was blocked under a username block. The editor could return tomorrow with a new name. There's no indication that there would be any G5 problems if brought to mainspace. I think it should be kept and evaluated based on the AFC criteria including the possibility of G13 deletion later. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:57, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as per WP:G13: last real edit was done in February 2015. As per User:SmokeyJoe, this shouldn't come to MfD. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 29 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.