Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Creston Davis

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: deleted under speedy criterion WP:G4 by. Procedural close. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:09, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Creston Davis


Procedural nomination. It looks like while this draft was waiting in the long AfC cue it was placed in mainspace and subjected to AfD Articles for deletion/Creston Davis where the decision was to delete as failing WP:PROF. As that closed about 5 days ago I can hardly send the same draft to mainspace. Had the draft been properly moved to mainspace the Draft page would have been deleted as a Redirect to a deleted page. At this point Deletion Review is the answer if someone objects. We need to remove this draft as a procedural matter because of the evident copy paste move. Legacypac (talk) 06:53, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete — I'd think that this is close to falling under WP:CSD (housekeeping) territory. In fact, if it were changed into a redirect to Creston Davis today, it would meet that "redirect to a deleted page" criterion without any further question.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 07:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, per Articles for deletion/Creston Davis, but allow WP:REFUND if something changes to overcome the deletion reasons voiced in the AfD. There would be no need for DRV.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:12, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Just to clarify it was at the tail end beyond 8 weeks unreviewed when I found it. Likely skipped over by reviewers because it is not a simple pass on WP:PROF. The page got a careful analysis at AfD though. Legacypac (talk) 07:23, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. CSD G8 is applicable. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:56, 16 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment if a page with the same topic was deleted from mainspace, does this mean that an editor cannot draft a new page (perhaps improve it) again? Is this the same page that was deleted or have improvements been made? Egaoblai (talk) 09:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you read the nomination ... it's the same page unless an Admin confirms otherwise. The issue is notability which was well canvussed at the AfD and can't be fixed unless something changes  Legacypac (talk) 10:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.