Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Cup eperiment ( I'm a kid)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Snowy Delete - no chance will become a fork of the articles listed below. — xaosflux  Talk 04:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Cup eperiment ( I'm a kid)


Very intereresting: but basically nonsense. Unencyclopaedic, WP:NOT, etc. O Fortuna!  ...Imperatrix mundi.  16:14, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST. North America1000 18:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. The content is not actually nonsense, and the subject-matter is encyclopedic in theory (to the extent the result the article describes is one the author found surprising, see Geometrical-optical illusions), but obviously the presentation is not in a suitable form. This is probably a speedy candidate. Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete – Yes, per WP:Not. I think the proper link for the not-nonsense is Piaget's theory of cognitive development though. Debouch (talk) 01:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment Sorry; I used the word 'nonsense' in the vernacular rather than our specific definition of the word. Nonsense as in: pointlessness that has no place here in that form. O Fortuna!  ...Imperatrix mundi.  21:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete, but I must admit it has great humour value. The conclusion is a profound philosophical revelation. Laurdecl talk 07:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.