Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Curve Fever Pro

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:11, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Curve Fever Pro


Declined 7 times now, mainly over lack of reliable sources. Deserves a discussion for deletion. If concensus is not to delete, I think the page should be promoted so other editors can be exposed to it who can fix it or AfD it. Legacypac (talk) 18:01, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Please keep it as a draft so we can improve the article! --Loley777 (talk) 15:51, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Every editor is entitled to at least one genuinely terrible idea (some editors are entitled to two or three). User:Legacypac's entitled terrible idea is that a bad draft should be promoted to article space to see if it gets fixed or AFD's.  A bad draft belongs in draft space or in the bit bucket.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - This has wasted enough electrons in draft space and needs deleting. However, if it isn't deleted, it should stay in draft space.  Robert McClenon (talk) 18:24, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If we can't agree this needs deleting after all the declines, it deserves to face the realities of mainspace instead of being kicked around in Draft forever. The creator has asserted it is good for mainspace 7 times now. Legacypac (talk) 18:29, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.