Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:DAC Studios

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) Queen of Hearts (🏳️‍⚧️ • 🏳️‍🌈) 07:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Draft:DAC Studios

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Many external links, unreliable sources. The image is fair-use but not tagged as so. This is my first MfD, so it's probably not accurate and the not correct thing to do. Myrealnamm&#39;s Alternate Account (talk) 15:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The external link are part of the sources, alot of information regarding the topic is stated in their social media. Image also used under fair use with credit given as the license protecting it stated. AzzakyAris (talk) 16:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep Not unambiguous promotion (G11). It has problems, but we can fix them; if they can't within 6 months, it'll be deleted under G13 anyway. Air on White (talk) 19:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * 'Comment, - Maybe the nominator is unfamiliar with drafts and does not know that they are not deleted for sourcing or notability,, because they are meant to be improved. McClenon mobile (talk) 20:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Not G11, so this falls into the category of WP:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity. Commons issues should be handled through the Commons processes. Curbon7 (talk) 06:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.