Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:DNS Made Easy

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was procedural close. Page has been moved/merged to mainspace at DNS Made Easy, and is now at AfD JohnCD (talk) 12:42, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Draft:DNS Made Easy


Submitted 5 times without improvement. No evdence of notability ,and reads like a press release.  DGG ( talk ) 03:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with . Another account has created the same article in main space on 10 September as DnsMadeEasy. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 16:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note Faced with an (in my view) invalid attempt to speedy delete the mainspace version, I history merged the draft into that version, which is now at DNS Made Easy. I failed to note the in-progress mfd, for which I apologize. I suggest this discussion be closed, and editors consider whether to put the mainspace version through AfD. Ther seem to be some independent sources, but a good deal of spammy content, and perhaps not enough valid sources to establish notability. I would close this, but feel as if it is inappropriate for me to do so, under the circumstances. DES (talk) 01:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Follow-up There is indeed an AfD for the article itself, found here. Primefac (talk) 01:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: The MfD tag was stripped in a major rewrite, or was it a history merge?  The page is now at DNS Made Easy.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:44, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * , there was a histmerge because the Article was a copy/paste from the draft. DeSiegel explained it above. Primefac (talk) 02:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * , the draft was copied and pasted to mainspace. Someone tagged it for speedy deletion because it was moved out of AfC withoiut review. Of course, that is not a valid speedy deletion reason, but in dealing with that, i saw that it was a C&P, and checking found that others had edited the draft, so a hist merge was required. i did that, but in multiple steps because I missed (at first) that the mainspace was not at quite the same name. In the process I failed to note the mfd until the histmerge had been done, so then i posted here to explain the matter. The ASfd was opened after I finished the histmerge, either after or while I was first posting here. It may have been poor procedure on my part, but the Afd is i think now the place to discuss this one way or the other. DES (talk) 02:46, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I was commenting on the 13 September version of this discussion, which I pre-loaded, and didn't notice your comments today when I posted mine. Yes, AfD is where this should continue.  This discussion should be closed.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.