Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Dan Riskin

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Keep. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:42, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Dan Riskin


apparent paid editing, refs do not support source Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * delete as nominator--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:10, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It at least needs to be heavily trimmed. Some sources are okay such as  Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 22:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Not bad enough to delete as failing anything at WP:NOT. Try blanking instead.  Same with User:Alpharun/Dan Riskin.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG with impact in healthcare quality and independent references from Forbes, Technology Review , and Congress . Originally needed trimming and didn't have reliable 3rd party refs, but now has been updated. Interested to hear more comments. Alpharun (talk) 22:40, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * keep... seems that it's been trimmed, a lot of the discussion is around references so spent some time on this, ones like and  are objective, ones like  aren't that applicable, of note  was an interesting read NimbleToad (talk) 06:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.