Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Darwin's Yearbook

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  redirect to Darwin's Yearbook. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:56, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Darwin's Yearbook

 * – (View MfD)

An article of superior quality has been created at Darwin's Yearbook, so there's no need to wait 5 more months unless that article should go to AfD. If draftification is required, this will get in the way. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 06:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep but redirect to the article to avoid a fork or a waste of editorial time. If there is any content here that is not in the article, a redirect will allow it to be merged into the article. Draftification o9f a valid article is possible but not highly likely, if it does happen a G6 db-move speedy can clear the way. No need to delete in advance of any such situation arising. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 14:15, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy redirect, WP:SRE. Every part of the MfD rationale is not a valid reason to delete.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:38, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy Redirect - Proposing to delete a draft because the article is already in article space seems to be a periodic good-faith error, but still an error. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:13, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.