Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Dastor

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete.  bibliomaniac 1  5  18:19, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Dastor

 * – (View MfD)

Draft:Dastor has been twice submitted as a draft consisting only of an infobox with no text. When it was first submitted, it was Rejected by User:Salimfadhley as not sufficiently notable. I was about to Reject it for the same reason, because it doesn't make a credible claim of significance. The submitter then Reverted the rejection: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Dastor&type=revision&diff=982509244&oldid=982507391&diffmode=source At this point deletion seems like the least disruptive way to deal with disruption. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:40, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - this page is obvious vanity spam by an abusive editor. --Salimfadhley (talk) 17:33, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: This user appears to be socking between two accounts ( and, SPI opened here) and based on the edit summary of Special:Permalink/982462012 is also a WP:UPE. This should probably just been WP:G11d, but since we're already here we may as well just do this. Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:24, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, resubmitted without improvement, and reversion of the AfC rejection. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:40, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.