Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Datari Turner

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn by nominator with no other !votes. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 04:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Datari Turner


The mainspace Datari Turner is WP:SALTED so this draft is not likely to ever become an article. It might be suitable to protect the draftspace as well. SeraphWiki (talk) 22:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: I could be wrong, but from my understanding, just because an article has been WP:SALTED does not mean that it will never become an article. According to the policy: Contributors wishing to re-create a salted title with more appropriate content should either contact an administrator (preferably the protecting administrator), file a request at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection, or use the deletion review process. Can we not just bring an admin in to review this draft? JacobPace (talk) 23:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The discussion in Articles_for_deletion/Datari_Turner_(2nd_nomination) suggests that re-drafting could help. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * An admin can review it, but it should have been discussed with the protecting admin first - pinging - most reviewers are not admins and I don't think I can accept a draft while the mainspace is protected.I haven't seen the previous versions so it might also be helpful if past participants such as the nominator  could comment. The decision to accept recreation of this article would have to be made by an admin.SeraphWiki (talk) 00:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Conventionally/historically if a page is going through the Draft/AFC process and is considered acceptable to a reviewer, all that is necessary is to contact an admin (there are about 30 currently working with AFC directly, but any will do) and they will unsalt the page, because the implication is that it has been vetted and is acceptable (and has met the concerns of the AFD/salt reasons).
 * If there is no policy reason for nominating this draft for deletion, I suggest withdrawing this nomination. Primefac (talk) 00:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn. SeraphWiki (talk) 03:43, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.