Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:David Hecht

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 22:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Draft:David Hecht

 * – (View MfD)

While the article is in draft format, it neither includes anything of significance and doesn't meet notability. The BoardgameGeek link as a a reference doesn't even include any content. I further googled to look for sources and found nothing meaningful. The games with which he created are mentioned under a subset of a wider category 18XX and are neither common from distribution or in terms of game design.Gort2020 (talk) 18:06, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - The arguments made by User:Gort2020 are arguments for declining the submission of the draft, not for deletion of the draft.
 * An article was redirected to a list in 2008 as per Articles for deletion/David Hecht. That is a reason not to accept the draft unless the draft has been improved.  After twelve years, it is not a strong argument in itself for a decline, let alone for a reject or a delete.
 * The author or someone else may find further evidence of notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:52, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I was looking at articles to improve as part of various projects really this is pretty close to speedy deletion creations. There is no supporting source available to support notability even sites that don't require notability don't exist. The is no sign of any significance. so you are saying the page stays forever in draft because no will ever submit it because it can't meet the criteria to pass. "further evidence" suggests any evidence has been found so far. Not only is the BGG entry empty after being created the only weblink is a sub pure text entry. I have seen AfD's and the issues for game designers from a few years back for several game creators but this clearly doesn't meet creation criteria which often don't even pass for a single award winning game and will 100% not pass review. one look at BGG shows that it hasn't even got a following in terms of any game play. My question is can you find a suggestion to support significance might be found as in an unlisted game or something missed by BGGGort2020 (talk) 21:57, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 11:36, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.