Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Debprasad Dutta

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn (by nominator attempting to blank the page) (non-admin closure) * Pppery * it has begun... 21:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Debprasad Dutta

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

No notable content. Sources fail to back up claims. Unambiguous promotion of subject. This page, even if cleaned up and removed of advertising, would never be ready to be included. I tried to find notable info online and in this page and failed.  Chamaemelum  (  talk  ) 07:43, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm not sure I get why this MfD has been moved. Sure, the draft has all sorts of issues – I've said as much in my AfC decline comments – but there's nothing that cannot be rectified, esp. as this is still in the draft space. I'm not against deletion, as such, just fail to see the imperative of this nom. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. Maybe it was my mistake. I don't know the criteria for miscellany for deletion. I was thinking it may save the editor time--the person is probably going to spend more time fixing it only for it to be rejected again; although that probably isn't a good reason for deletion.  Chamaemelum  (  talk  ) 08:04, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.