Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Defiant Wrestling

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:38, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Defiant Wrestling


Defiant Wrestling has been deleted multiple times as being not notable. The draft has been declined for failing notability. The organization is now closed so there is no reason to believe it will ever become notable.  Galatz גאליץ שיחה Talk  19:27, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete with silver bullets and silver chloride, which is a salt. This draft was rejected, and is still being worked on.  Rejection should either be final or be discussed, not just worked on.  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:47, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
 * It looks deleteable as PROMOTION, but there are sources. At least the first three WP:THREE should be carefully analysed before deleting. I haven’t looked at them yet. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:15, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:PW/RS has wrestling specific sources and whether or not they are notable. Cagematch.net is considered all WP:ROUTINE so it cannot establish notability. Any sources on the draft that are youtube or wearedefiant.com would be primary. Here are the remainder of the sources:
 * - Covers their name change, but does not go in depth beyond that
 * - Goes somewhat in depth, but focuses a lot on the UK professional wrestling scene in general
 * - Not a RS
 * - Vast majority of the article is a quote from the twitter page showing it closed
 * - ROUTINE coverage
 * - General listing of events, not specific to Defiant
 * - Another general listing of events
 * - ROUTINE coverage
 * - Just a copy of Defiant's press release, so PRIMARY
 * - I do not see Defiant mentioned here anywhere, appears to just be pulling in to tie more info into the previous article
 * - Focuses on a different promotion with a passing mention of Defiant
 * - Dead link
 * - Vast majority of the article is a quote from the twitter page showing it closed
 * - Passing mention
 * - Not sure if its a RS, but again majority of the article is a quote from the twitter page showing it closed
 * - ROUTINE
 * - About their championship at another promotion, barely a passing mention, and ROUTINE coverage
 * - ROUTINE coverage
 * - ROUTINE coverage
 * - ROUTINE coverage
 * - ROUTINE coverage
 * Based on a full analysis of all sources, once you remove ROUTINE and backdoor PRIMARY, the only RS left are 1 & 2 above. I do not believe that is enough to meet even the bare minimum of WP:GNG. -  Galatz גאליץ שיחה Talk  13:18, 8 August 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per Galatz. Also delete for being a WP:Reference bombed commercial product. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:55, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.