Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Delta leisure Group

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:41, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Delta leisure Group


Non-notable company, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP, and the user who created this draft is now blocked. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If it is indeed the "4th biggest independent record label in the UK" it would be notable. It's worth keeping and finding sources.  DGG ( talk ) 20:05, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I cannot find a source for this, I had a look before putting this up for deletion. Just had another quick look, and still cannot find source supporting this claim. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:12, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 * While I agree with DGG in principle, I cannot find sources about this either. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:04, 19 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Only 1 reference actually mentions the company which merely proves existence, not notability. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:10, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.