Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Destination: Dewsbury

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Redirect - Disagree entirely with it but arguing to the death is pointless as after a week it'll just be redirected so whatever redirected. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:17, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Destination: Dewsbury


Article has already been created as Destination: Dewsbury so there's no need for this draft as any improvements could and should be made on the article, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 21:52, 20 November 2016 (UTC) :* - "Yes more evidence of AfC/draftspace being broken" - Unless I'm reading this wrong how is anything being broken ? .... I came across an abandoned draft and so nominated it accordingly? ...., As for the my word choice - That's irrelevant and doesn't warrant a response, Redirecting achieves nothing except to keep the text which is already at Destination: Dewsbury and so redirecting would be rather pointless as there's nothing to preserve in this case. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:11, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect, only. Yes more evidence of AfC/draftspace being broken. Deleting the evidence doesn't address the problem. "already" is a wrong, sloppy word choice, the right word would be "since". --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:00, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.