Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Didar Khan

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Salvio 16:26, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Didar Khan

 * – (View MfD)

Constantly recreated advertisement article on a non notable singer, has been speedily deleted 3 times, this is the fourth version. Requesting deletion as an unambiguous advertisement and to allow future speedy deletion and salting under G4.    Kadzi    (talk) 09:43, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt - Pretty blatant WP:G11 in my opinion, but creating the precedent so WP:G4 can be used in the future is fine as well. Nathan2055talk - contribs 01:08, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree, based on the cited sources and my own searches, that Khan doesn't meet the encyclopedia's inclusion criteria and, with the usual caveats, is unlikely to become notable anytime soon. I see only two speedy deletions (4 August by Viridae and 12 August by Athaenara), which would make this the third version. But the rapid recreations, now by a second single-purpose account and without learning from their mistakes, are disruptive and warrant deletion here. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:56, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete with sodium chloride. Too much is enough, or enough is too much.  Robert McClenon (talk) 15:46, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.