Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Differential cohomology

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: redirect to Cohomology. Alex ShihTalk 10:18, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Differential cohomology


Taku refuses to be given 6 months at AfC or the chance that the page be accepted. He has also refused to store this info in his userspace - even moving it to someone else's userspace and editwarring to delete the redirect. Deletion at MfD followed by comfirmation at DRV is the only answer to this disruption. Legacypac (talk) 21:17, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Please give a deletion reason: again you haven't given a reason for the deletion... -- Taku (talk) 21:19, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

The creator is edit warring, vandalising my posts, disrupting all over the site. Best to remove these sub stubs to end the drama. Legacypac (talk) 21:20, 27 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Ammm, MfD is not a place to discuss an editor's behavior. In Wikipedia, we don't just delete stuff just because a user feels like it. We are more professionalized: you need to clearly explain hoe/which policy the draft is in violation with. -- Taku (talk) 23:11, 27 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Cohomology: Using the text of the page itself Differential cohomology is a differential refinement of an ordinary cohomology (emphasis mine).  Searching for that phrase comes up with Cohomology.  The targeting of the redirect does not have to be 100% correct, but it is at least within the ballpark/criket field/stadum/etc.  If redirect is not accepted the only other option thst services Wikipedia's prupose WP:5P1 is Delete. Hasteur (talk) 00:19, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect as a non-expert, this does seem to be a reasonable solution.  DGG ( talk ) 08:25, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Support. User has been given long enough to add references, expand, or propose a merge into the main article. He did not do that. The only thing he did on this page was edit-warring about a AFC template. If the majority of this MfD decides in favor of a redirect, I will be fine with that. -- &raquo; Shadowowl   Marcos Rodriguez  |  t  |  SPI  |  AIV  |  Sandbox  |  Helpdesk  &raquo;    14:49, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment the proposed redirect is fine by me. Better Admin lock the page though. Legacypac (talk) 14:55, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.