Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Digav Aaditya Singh Rajput

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 10:07, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Digav Aaditya Singh Rajput

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

The draft has been declined 4 times and rejected once and the author continues to delete decline/rejection notices and continues to submit without addressing the issues raised by the reviewers. This has now officially become a waste of time. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 03:24, 11 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - SOP when a user repeatedly submits a bad draft without a good-faith effort at improving it, doubly so if they're trying to hide that it's been constantly declined. —Jéské Couriano  v^&lowbar;^v  a little blue Bori 03:32, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per Mcmatter and Jéské Couriano. The multiple attempts to stuff it with fake references and remove review templates suggest that this will never be worth the time consumed on more reviews. Storchy (talk) 10:27, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, Jéské Couriano and Storchy. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 13:17, 11 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete - Concur with McMatter. Being resubmitted tendentiously.  Removal of the MFD tag does not stop the MFD, but makes it more obvious that deletion is right.  Robert McClenon (talk) 06:16, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom — python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 04:18, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.