Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Dinh gio hu

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:41, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Dinh gio hu

 * – (View MfD)

Terribly written article from a now blocked user for vandalism/attack pages. Page has little chance of being notable, both images are up for being a copyright infringement, and the only content is two sentences.    Kadzi    (talk) 15:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. PhilKnight (talk) 15:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * See also the user's unblock request. this user was blocked on commons for vandalism, and the images were deleted. If anyone ever want to write an article on that, he needs to restart anyway as per nom, so I think we should do the liberty thing of resetting the draft to its empty state. Victor Schmidt (talk) 16:06, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom, and a stupid request. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:16, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Really nothing more to say. Even if someone wanted to write a real article on this topic later, this isn't going to help them do so. WP:TNT is in full effect. Nathan2055talk - contribs 01:29, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.