Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Dj Lytmas

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 15:46, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Dj Lytmas


I nominated the article 5 days ago and the AFD was closed with the article being moved to draft, Since then the draft has just sat here with various IPs persistently adding adding copyvio images to it, The creator and the IPs are trying to promote him as much as possible and are only here for that reason alone, Thanks – Davey 2010 Talk 21:55, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete the AfD was NAC closed after only 1 day - the nom and another editor said delete, but an IP asked for draftification. The AfD should have been let to run it's course. It's spam. Legacypac (talk) 22:19, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Looking at the AfD, that was a quite poor early NAC by . I'd vote to overturn if it went to deletion review, and remind Geoffrey that NACs at AfD are to be unambiguous per WP:NACD. Davey2010, WP:DELREV was probably the best place to take this rather than MfD, but since we're here now let's delete. VQuakr (talk) 22:28, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Indeed I'd support an overturn at DRV, but we are here now. I just took out 3 dud refs - one for el nino to wikipedia, one showing his birth hospital exists, and one dead link. The guy's listed name does not match the one used in an interview, not sure what's up with that. Legacypac (talk) 22:42, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * - I did and do disagree with the close however being absolutely honest It seemed a lot of work to go to DRV, wait a week, AFD's then reopened for another 7 days with the draft moved back .... in all that could've took 2 or more weeks ... so instead of doing it that way I figured I'd let the close stand and revisit this in a month or so however as I said 5 days on and the draft's barely been touched so figured now was better than December, I do agree doing it this way might seem pointless but this way gets the job done quicker really, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 00:47, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Sounds like the three of us agree on all points. Thanks for the follow-up on this one. VQuakr (talk) 08:47, 19 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete--Echo all of the above points. Winged Blades Godric 15:58, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and revert the bad NAC at Articles for deletion/VJ LYTMAS. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. and revert the close, as suggested. There's no point in adding the complexities of going to Deletion review; this is altogether obvious.  DGG ( talk ) 00:12, 20 November 2017 (UTC)


 * I'm not trying to BLUDGEON anyone but wouldn't it be easier just to have this deleted now that we're here ?, the AFD close was bullshit and if this is deleted I would note this on the AFD but from my view it seems a lot of flaffing around when either way the page is going to be deleted anyway, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 00:24, 20 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom and per nom's point immediately above re. the bullshittery of the original AfD, and the fact that there is bugger-all notability suggested. Even A7 is not impossible, as, frankly, I'm having a hard time seeing a CCS- what,that they spin records and create mix tapes? That they love deejaying? That they started their own record company? -possibly- but the fact that the sole source saying that seems to be the subject's own website somewhat diminishes the credibility of that claim to significance I think. &mdash; fortuna  velut luna Rarely receiving (many) pings. Bizarre. 15:34, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:13, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment/question how in the name of all that is Wiki can you NAC an AFD after just one day? After voting in the AfD? That's one heck of a supervote! -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:16, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Any admin is free to revert he NAC. Has anyone actually asked User:GeoffreyT2000 to revert his close?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:47, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Apparently neither. I think this is so far along now that the AfD close is moot. I think that we are heading for a consensus. It would have been better to revert that close before this got started. Might as well finish here. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:32, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Just to note I do accept fault for not asking or atleast reverting the AFD myself, To put it short I had a feeling they'd refuse and so in that respect me asking could've been a complete waste of time, This has all become a mess I know but as I said I do accept fault for not reverting or atleast asking first. – Davey 2010 Talk 14:28, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
 * It probably seemed the right thing at the time-- "preserve" and all. We all make mistakes. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:09, 23 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete non notable artist and salt all the titles to prevent this coordinated attempt of promotion. The article has jut been recreated with dubious name customization to circumvent scrutiny. The people who !voted here might be interested in the new AfD. Articles for deletion/DVJ LYTMAS &thinsp;&mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 09:13, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.