Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Dubaimachines.com

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete, but not protected. No evidence that is necessary (yet). kelapstick(bainuu) 11:19, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Dubaimachines.com


A page that simply isn't notable and keeps getting resubmitted with little to no improvement. Sulfurboy (talk) 00:08, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and lightly salt. Oh wait, there is no such thing as "lightly salt" (I guess we could delete it and prohibit non-confirmed/autoconfirmed editors from creating it, but that would defeat the whole point of Draft: space).  How about instead of deleting, delete the content portion of the page and put a dummy "AFC declined" notice at the top saying that, due to a consensus reached at this discussion that the company was not notable as of [closing date of this discussion] any new submission will not even be considered unless the submitter adds a comment to the talk page saying he has read and understands Notability, Notability (organizations and companies), and What Wikipedia is not AND the submission clearly demonstrates that the company is clearly notable (i.e. not in the "grey area" of "maybe notable, maybe not notable").davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  03:21, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment As with all stale AFC submissions, if this page is not modified for 6 months, it will be eligible for WP:G13 speedy-deletion, without prejudice against un-deletion. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  03:22, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. Subject is a two-year-old, clearly non-notable sales site, supported by a few press releases. Declined seven times at AFC in two months. Enough is enough. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 08:58, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete but don't salt unless the page is recreated. The topic has been determined to be non-notable by six separate AfC reviewers (and was declined by a seventh for promotional tone); "No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability" applies in this situation. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 09:30, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.