Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Duol

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. 9 re-submissions with no independent sources; I think it's not unfair to suggest this is promotional in nature. Not comfortable with a redirect as it suggests that Duol is somehow synonymous/representative of air-supported structures in the way that Xerox is representative of copiers. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:51, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Duol

 * — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 21:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 21:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Advertisement Rejected 9 times so far. Delete at MfD Legacypac (talk) 17:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Not simply an advertisement, and if it were it would be G11-ed. Redirect to the parent topic Air-supported structure, where this major manufacturer deserves mention.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 21:25, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.