Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:E. Michael Jones

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 18:40, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:E. Michael Jones


Tendentious resubmission of recently deleted article. See Articles for deletion/E. Michael Jones and Deletion review/Log/2019 April 8. The Keep !votes at the AFD, this draft, and the DRV all appear to be sockpuppetry. Need ECP in both draft space and article space. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:54, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Jones fails notability standards and I have yet to see any evidence that proves otherwise, including in my own searches for reliable sources. The only reason why this is still going on is because Jones and his actually notable buddy Owen Benjamin have taken issue with it on social media/Youtube encouraging these actions by socks. I think we should probably WP:SALT to make sure they don't try to sneak a new article creation using a similar name. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:12, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and SALT. It's like the good old days when we discussed problem drafts at MFD. Legacypac (talk) 19:15, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Salt per WP:TE — python coder (talk &#124; contribs) 18:27, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - The Deletion Review request was closed as suckpoppetry. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:38, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. I didn't look too closely at the draft while at DRV, just noting that it existed, but on further review it's fairly obvious the draft is purely being used for disruption. It seems mostly from various IPs, so I'm not sure ECP is necessary for the draft, but I'm not going to WP:BEANS it, in case the currently-anon editors get ideas. Alpha3031 (t • c) 18:33, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:49, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.