Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Earth Care Equipments

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  speedy delete per CSD G8, after article was moved to main namespace and deleted. Graham 87 03:30, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Earth Care Equipments


Not notable, and appears to be advertising. Clubjustin (talk) 13:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete; could've been CSDed. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  13:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note Try telling hulla that. Check the edit records. Clubjustin (talk) 13:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, speedy close, and give a whale of a trouting to the nom. At 10:50 this morning, an inexperienced editor began to write this article. Six minutes later, at 10:56, while the article appeared incomplete, the nom deletion tag-bombed it. WP:BITE is a guideline, after all, and reflects consensus. There's nothing to be gained by this rush to judgment; and there's a lot to be gained by affording new editors decent opportunities to learn. Once you've moved the article to draftspace, there's absolutely no reason to delete the page, except a pointless notch in your speedy deletion log. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 15:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.