Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Ecampusontario

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:07, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Ecampusontario


This appears to be promotional with many primary sources, but Domdeparis disagreed with the deletion on the talk page. Let's try MfD here to determine consensus. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 02:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep thanks for pinging me. I do think that this article has its place on WP. I have found a few sources which I think should help the notability and primary sources issues.      . Some of them are passing mentions but I think there is enough to pass GNG.Domdeparis (talk) 11:40, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Leaning keep. Possibly notable, clearly not a hoax. Let this go the way of drafts generally - either get improved or get abandoned and deleted automatically, in due time. bd2412  T 00:11, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.