Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Educreation Publishing

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Delete. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:45, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Educreation Publishing


Self-serving blatant advertising because it's the company account starting the advertising with clear republished announcements, and the one review hasn't been met with sufficient improvements, which is why WP:NOT applies. SwisterTwister  talk  03:49, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. This draft article contains relatively little by way of information about the company itself. There are five sources which pick up on some self-published works that were produced using this company. While verifying the existence of the company, the sources themselves don't provide any WP:CORPDEPTH. Drchriswilliams (talk) 17:40, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.