Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Edwin Yeator Tukpah

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Spartaz Humbug! 14:58, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Edwin Yeator Tukpah

 * Relisted. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:42, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Relisted. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:42, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

This badly formatted draft autobiography is being tendentiously resubmitted without adding in-line citations and without providing any evidence of notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:13, 4 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete and I removed the latest submission for review as none of this suggests any notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:38, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep . The references indicate notability.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:39, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ricky81682 (talk) 08:42, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Given "This draft has no references to establish notability, and there is no claim of satisfying association football notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:56, 2 March 2016 (UTC)" and "tenditiously submited", I think we should delete. Undelete if more sources are provided, if they add to evidence of notability, or if the author engages in conversation. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:33, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * So you're changing your !vote? Before you stated "the references indicate notability" so should the keep be stricken? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 20:29, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I think they do, but there are degrees of notability, and per Robert, on review, I don't think the required threshold is met. Given the tenditious point, I would like to support deletion, weakly. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 20:59, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I think if moved to mainspace, it would be deleted, based not on current state, but on limited potential and lack of further sources. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:08, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.