Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Edwina Dunn

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. I believe Requests for comment/User names can be used if more discussion is needed on the username Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:08, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Edwina Dunn

 * – (View MfD)

This draft appears to be an autobiography, because the name of the subject is Edwina Dunn and the name of the submitting account is Edwina Dunn. However, it has been resubmitted with the explanation that it is not an autobiography. (If it is not an autobiography, then the account violates the username guidelines.) The author isn't about to submit a satisfactory draft, and is wasting her time and our time. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:23, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - The submitter has asked me what to do on my talk page, and I have advised her to read the autobiography policy and the conflict of interest policy. Please respond here (not on my talk page).  Robert McClenon (talk) 14:27, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - The submitter says that they are not Edwina Dunn. In that case, they confused an article name with an account name, an error that occasionally happens although it is not our fault.  If so, if they change their user name and come here and request to Keep the draft in order to work with a more experienced editor to improve it, I will change my !vote to a Weak Keep, but only if they change their user name and come here.  Robert McClenon (talk) 19:21, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. No valid reasons for deletion listed so far. Many problems ... WP:COI (alleged], WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY (suspected) and WP:Reference bombed are not reasons for deletion even in mainspace.  Leave it alone for standard AfC processes.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:36, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Tag it COI. That’s enough for now, warn and block if the tag is removed without explanation. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:55, 10 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Neutral - The author has changed their account name, but has not come here. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:51, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - Murphy's Law states that when anything can possibly go wrong, it will. There should be a corollary that occasionally something will go wrong even though it could not possibly have gone wrong.  An editor using the name of a real living person as an account name because they think that an account name and an article name are the same is an example.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:51, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per SmokeyJoe. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 00:42, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.