Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Epic Jab

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  23:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Epic Jab

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Possibly self-promotion lol1VNIO (talk &#8226; contribs) 20:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * speedy Delete as patent nonsense. Dronebogus (talk) 22:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
 * This should either have been speedy deleted under some combination of G1, G2 and G3 or left for G13, a week long MFD discussion about pages like this is a complete waste of time. That being said Delete while it's here. 192.76.8.70 (talk) 01:38, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as per G1 criteria of the criiteria for speedy deletion guideline. Xingqiu  •  Talk  03:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - It's a stupid stub of a draft. It doesn't do any harm in draft space.  Maybe the originator will expand it to something that can be deleted, or (less likely) to something that can be reviewed.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:46, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. No discernible value. Llwyld (talk) 06:21, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - pages like this simply waste the time of editors. Should've been CSD tagged instead. Emir Shane (talk) 18:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per G3, as this is vandalism by a user with the same user name. 2601:647:5800:1A1F:889E:96A8:F1A2:A8E7 (talk) 23:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.