Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Escort Peril

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:36, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Escort Peril


Non notable self published electronic book, by non notable author. Will never met WP:NBOOK. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:52, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NMFD. The authors may believe it will become notable shortly. If that is not realized, then the draft will be beamed away by the starship G13. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 01:03, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:22, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. It might be improved. If not, as Godsy notes, it will be deleted as abandoned in due time. MfD does not seem to be a worthwhile venue for drafts that do not have more serious concerns, like hoaxes or potentially defamatory content. bd2412  T 03:49, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Meh. This looks like someone's school book report. If no other Wikipedia regular had touched it since it was declined in early March, it would have been G13-deleted anyway 2 months from now. Just leave it alone. I agree with BD2412, MFD isn't a good venue for discussing uncontroversial drafts of non-notable subjects. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:05, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete--IAR and Common Sense.Delete per nom. &#x222F; WBG converse 05:59, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - No effort being made to address book notabiity or other issues. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:08, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.